Chelsea v Tottenham: What 0.05 xG actually means

Sports · Wainaina Mark · November 2, 2025
Chelsea v Tottenham: What 0.05 xG actually means
Rodrigo Bentancur of Tottenham Hotspur clashes with Trevoh Chalobah of Chelsea PHOTO/ AMA/Getty Images
In Summary

A 0.05 xG for a full 90 minutes is brutal in its simplicity;  it says Tottenham’s entire attacking output had roughly a 5% chance of producing a single goal.

Expected goals (xG) scores the quality of chances a team creates. A 0.05 xG for a full 90 minutes is brutal in its simplicity;  it says Tottenham’s entire attacking output had roughly a 5% chance of producing a single goal. In modern football, that’s practically a blank on the scoreboard of chance creation.

Why that number stings

Normal top-six or solid midtable sides usually register between 1.0 and 2.0 xG; even a cautious defensive display often yields 0.3–0.6 xG.

A 0.05 reading suggests Spurs mustered little more than a speculative long-range poke or a blocked attempt, nothing that seriously troubled the goalkeeper. For a club built on attacking quality, such a low figure isn’t bad luck; it’s a glaring indicator that creative mechanisms simply didn’t click.

What it exposes about the performance

• Creative collapse: The team failed to rotate, open channels, or produce dangerous final-third moments.

Tactical deadlock: The game plan was either too predictable or easily nullified, leaving Spurs with no meaningful routes to goal.

• Low individual impact: Key creators and forwards were either starved of service or ineffective when given it.

• Confidence drain: With almost nothing to bite on, players retreat into safe patterns that only worsen the chance drought.

Immediate fallout for Spurs

The metric hands fuel to critics and fans: It’s tangible proof the attack isn’t working, ratcheting up pressure on manager and players. Coaching priorities will shift to movement, transitional patterns, and set-piece creativity designed to raise the quality of shots. Opponents will mark the weakness and replicate the same containment unless Spurs adapt quickly.

The fix; what to expect next

Tactical tweaks: More direct entries into the box, clearer overloads on the flanks, and quicker combos in tight areas.

Personnel moves: Different midfield link players or rotated attackers to spark progressive passing and incisive through balls.

Final-third urgency: Practice for higher-value entries into the penalty area, better-timed runs, and permission to take risks to break the deadlock.

In short, 0.05 xG is less a statistical oddity and more a flashing warning light,  a quantifiable measure of how utterly toothless Spurs were. The remedy is clear and immediate, but the club needs to act fast if Saturday’s performance is not to become a pattern.

Join the Conversation

Enjoyed this story? Share it with a friend:

Latest Videos
MOST READ THIS MONTH

Stay Bold. Stay Informed.
Be the first to know about Kenya's breaking stories and exclusive updates. Tap 'Yes, Thanks' and never miss a moment of bold insights from Radio Generation Kenya.